Vietnam Essay

& # 8221 ; : How And Wh Did The Us Get Involved? Essay, Research Paper

Viet nams: How and Why the United States Got Involved

The struggle in Vietnam which is besides called the Ten Thousand-Day War was an on-going conflict from 1945 to 1975. In the 30 old ages of combat, the United States would lose over 57,000 work forces while Vietnamese dead numbered two million ( Maclear 2 ) . The Vietnam War is really interesting because many people have wondered how and why the United States got involved in a war that truly didn? T seem to concern them.

American engagement officially began in 1950 when the US authorities recognized the Bao Dai authorities and began directing the Gallic assistance to contend off the Communist backed Viet Minh led by Ho Chi Minh ( Scheer 10 ) . The Gallic lost the war because it was non to the full committed to a? win? policy ( Scheer 10 ) . The Bao Dai, anti-Communist patriot option, whom the Truman and Eisenhower Administrations had backed, had failed to undersell the entreaty of the Viet Minh ( Scheer 11 ) . The monetary value of peace involved the surrendering of some part of the state to the Communists, and the United States could non oppose since it had non become profoundly involved ( Scheer 12 ) . The United States alternatively placed its hopes on a? new anti-Communist patriot option? and his name was Ngo Dinh Diem.

Diem accepted the offer and on July 7, 1954 his authorities was officially organized. This started a new stage of U.S. engagement in Vietnam. Senator John F. Kennedy recommended, in order to forestall the farther spread of communism in Southeast Asia, that the Gallic grant independency to South Vietnam, support the authorities? s ground forces, and? whenever necessary? [ make ] some committedness of our work force? ( Scheer 15 ) . The colony at Geneva in July, 1954, did three things: 1 ) it ended the war ; 2 ) divided Vietnam in half? temporarily? ; and 3 ) called for peace and reunion of the state ( Scheer 16 ) .

Diem? s authorities believed in tight cardinal control to deviate the nationalist revolution from Communist aims ( Scheer 21 ) . During the first twelvemonth of the new authorities, Diem crushed all beginnings of resistance left over from the Viet Minh ( Scheer 21 ) . By 1959, in the North, the Viet Minh had written off the possibility of the elections that they were supposed to acquire and turned to military agencies. This ended the illusive stableness of the Diem government ( Scheer 46 ) .

Diem was cognizant that his authorities could non last without the monolithic assistance from the United States so he based his whole entreaty on anti-communism ( Scheer 56 ) . But so, with the? Communist danger? the footing for guaranting continued American assistance, the? secure? countryside all of a sudden was overrun with? Communist terrorists? ( Scheer 56 ) .

At the terminal of April 1960, 18 Vietnamese Lords petitioned Diem to liberalise his government. The request said continual apprehensions had filled prisons to overruning and asserted that a conceited Government bureaucratism was corrupt and inefficient ( Scheer 59 ) . In 1961 Edward Landsdale was sent to Vietnam to do an over-all survey of the state of affairs. He reported that the state of affairs was near entire prostration and that if the policies of the Diem authorities and its advisors continued to be pursued the state would shortly be lost ( Scheer 60 ) . It was so decided to increase the Vietnamese Army from 150,000 to 250,000, which was a direct misdemeanor of the Geneva Accords, to concentrate its preparation on counter-insurgency ( Scheer 62 ) .

The concluding incidents that led to the putsch were a train of maltreatments, no individual one of which was needfully more of import than any other, even though the dramatic Buddhist crisis is often cited as the concluding straw ; it was one straw, a dramatic on. On November 1, the generals staged a

putsch and in the terminal Diem was killed ( Trager 179 ) .

In the spring of 1961, the magazine imperativeness began to revise its image of Diem? s authorities ( Scheer 66 ) . Jerry Rose, who was an expert on Vietnam, accepted the containment policy after Diem? s remotion and supported the overruling necessity for halting the spread of communism in Vietnam. He says:

To sum up: one solution now for the U.S. appears to be a show of power in South Vietnam which would pave the manner toward a compromising colony. But is the hazard of a power-play warranted? Southeast Asia has been likened to? a set of dominos. ? If South Vietnam falls ; the remainder of the blocks go, excessively. It would look, hence, that it is in the high involvement of the U.S. , as a leader and a system of authorities, to put on the line much in stabilising that tottering block ( Scheer 76-77 ) .

After Diem? s authorities was ousted, President Johnson had to make up one’s mind afresh the new ways in which the U.S. could assist Vietnam. The United States continued the policy of providing, preparation, and reding the Army of the Republic of Vietnam on an increasing graduated table ( Trager 179 ) . On August 2 and 4, North Vietnamese boats attacked the war vessels U.S.S. Maddox and U.S.S. C. Turner Joy in international Waterss in the Gulf of Tonkin. Johnson ordered an immediate answer, and on August 4, United States aircraft began bombing Vietnam. This operation became known as Rolling Thunder ( Trager 180 ) .

North Vietnam had intentionally made war on the South, though it had bound itself to forbear from war. The United States had become an ally of the South at the clip when no farther war between the two provinces had been expected ( Trager 182 ) . Finally, after this motiveless war had begun, the United States recognized its duty to its ally and easy, and with many scruples, assumed a responsible function in this confederation, a function which was defined, until every bit late as February, 1965, as one of aid and advice merely ( Trager 183 ) . This is when the United States eventually entered combat military personnels into the Vietnam struggle.

On April 7, 1965 President Johnson explained the United States function in Vietnam. In his address he defined the United States? intent:

There are those who wonder why we have a duty at that place. We have it for the same ground we have a duty for the defence of freedom in Europe. World War II was fought in both Europe and Asia, and when it ended we found ourselves with continued duty for the defence of freedom. Our aim is the independency of South Vietnam, and its freedom from onslaught. We want nil for ourselves, merely that the people of South Vietnam be allowed to steer their ain state in their ain manner ( Trager 190 ) .

The United States engagement in Vietnam was based on maintaining Southeast Asia from falling to the Communists. We think that our thoughts of democracy to be universally applicable. In Vietnam: foremost the Gallic were dominant, and the Communists out of power were interested in go againsting the regulations that assured Gallic domination. By 1954, the Communists had won, and at Geneva they were able to compose a new set of regulations. But the United States, interested in confirming its political orientation, broke those regulations and succeeded in set uping Diem in power. At that point the Rebel reappeared, this clip in the signifier of the Viet Cong ( Scheer 78 ) . The United States became involved militarily to demo the universe that their thoughts could non be conquered.

Maclear, Michael. The Ten Thousand-Day War. New York: St. Martin? s Press, 1981.

Scheer, Robert. How the United States Got Involved in Vietnam. Santa Barbara, CA: Center for the Study of Democratic Institutions, 1970.

Trager, Frank N. Why Vietnam? . New York: Frederick A.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *